Holiday Inn Rochester Airport
- 3 out of 5
- Avg. Member Rating
- 8
- Reviews
Mediocre
- May 3, 2009
- Rated 1 of 5 by
ahazzard1289 from Marlboro, New York
This hotel was very mediocre and would not recommend staying at it. The hotel staff was most unfriendly and didnt help at all. We asked for additional towels and they took 3 hours before we got them and they gave attitude. Geeze.
My Cousin's Wedding
- August 1, 2008
- Rated 3 of 5 by
a traveler from Travelocity.com
I chose the Holiday Inn at Rochester airport because I had stayed there before with my family. The prior visit made me chhose this hotel becasue the hotel was well maintained in 2005 but on my last visit it appears that has changed a great deal. The overall condition of the hotel did not meet the three star listing. The hallways were rife with peeling wall paper and paint.The cleanliness level was subpar in the rooms as well. For the price I believe youcan do much better. The next time I'm in the area I will look elsewhere. They have a great pool and a decent fitness room. There are laundry machines available and they are pet friendly. If these are your needs then by all means but if they are'nt priorities then I suggest you look elswhere too.
Noisy
- June 24, 2008
- Rated 2 of 5 by
a traveler from Travelocity.com
We stayed near the airport as we had an early morning flight. There were two loud hallway parties going on past 10:30 p.m. which the front desk was aware of. The front desk did move us to a quieter room but we only got 4 1/2 hours of sleep.
The Best in ROC
- January 10, 2008
- Rated 5 of 5 by
a traveler from Travelocity.com
This place is " top shelf " in Rochester. The facility is wonderful, the staff second to none. Close to the airport and all points in the Rochester area. Breakfast A++++
Overall good experience
- September 29, 2007
- Rated 4 of 5 by
a traveler from Travelocity.com
The only complaint I have is when we were checking out, our room service bill was higher than they had told us at the time of ordering. After finding the receipt on file, I was correct and they were trying to charge too much.