My primary interest in the Festival is the literary programme. I am an avid book reader, and I can always guarantee some fascinating discussions even if they are about books I would not normally read.
The literary events are generally held in the Pavilion Theatre and cost around $9 a session. The theatre is an OK venue. The seating is very steeply banked, so you have no problem seeing, and the sound is good. However, the theatre is small, and can get very warm in the evening after a hot day.
I saw two events this year, both of which cost about $9 each. They were very different. One was about global capitalism, the other about psychotherapy. Doesn't sound very appetising? Don't bet on i
...Read More
My primary interest in the Festival is the literary programme. I am an avid book reader, and I can always guarantee some fascinating discussions even if they are about books I would not normally read.
The literary events are generally held in the Pavilion Theatre and cost around $9 a session. The theatre is an OK venue. The seating is very steeply banked, so you have no problem seeing, and the sound is good. However, the theatre is small, and can get very warm in the evening after a hot day.
I saw two events this year, both of which cost about $9 each. They were very different. One was about global capitalism, the other about psychotherapy. Doesn't sound very appetising? Don't bet on it, read on.
The interesting thing about George Monbiot and Adair Turner was that, from an American perspective, they might be seen as being on the same side. Nevertheless they produced a robust debate. Monbiot is a hard line Socialist determined to stir up fears about the world being taken over by Big Business. Turner is in the new mould of European politics, happy to exist in a Capitalist economy, but at the same time determined to create a fair and just society. Monbiot, though an excellent speaker, was essentially a rabble rouser. Turner, on the other hand, taught me an awful lot about economics in a very short speech. I was so impressed I bought his book.
The other event featured psychotherapist, Adam Phillips. The more I see of psychotherapists, the more I become convinced that you have to be mad to be one. Phillips was a prime example, yet at the same time it was obvious that he was a very clever man. His views were very much at odds with the prevailing orthodoxy, and many of the audience became quite exercised at his refusal to seek scientific proof of the efficacy of his work. They also worried that someone who worked as a child psychologist would not necessarily seek to "cure" a child whose parents complained that there was something "wrong" with her. Phillips, however, is not a man for black and white.
One audience member quoted a passage from one of Phillips' books in which he said that there is nothing "wrong" with anyone, and challenged him to explain that assertion. Phillips explained that people adopt anti-social behaviour because it helps them somehow. You can't get them to stop by telling them it is wrong, you have to find out why they thought it was right for them, and help them understand why that view may no longer be appropriate. Not so mad after all, is he?
Read Less