The ticket price to the museum includes the use of self-guided audio tour equipment. What you can read on the signs is pretty much what you will hear on the device except when it gives in depth information on the particular object the number is by, which is surprising not very often. Although the information given is interesting, it is hard not to notice how it is propaganda. The most annoying thing to me was how the audio guide pronounced some of the things, especially Dalai Lama, which was pronounced Dalay Lamar (you have to hear it to really understand how much the name is butchered).
The Museum has quite an impressive assortment of artifacts, but is it all really from Tibet? Innocently, I just assumed they were all Tibetan artifacts. It is the Tibet Museum in the capital of Tibet, is not it? The only exhibit, where I realized that the items were from other parts of China was the exhibit on items that were gifts from the Chinese Emperors to the Tibetan Kings and Dalai Lamas. These items, according to the signs, proves that Tibet has been under the control of the Chinese Central Government since at least the Mind Dynasty. Besides the conclusion gained from these artifacts (I assume the presence of these items in Tibet are due to either peaceful coexistence, i.e. trade or similar to how current governments give each other gifts, but do not assume they control the other because of the gifts.) the most interesting thing about the Chinese spin on Tibetan history is how they have made the tern of Central Government apply back into the dynastic history of China. Not that term cannot apply to the dynastic system of ruling, I just thought it odd to see such a modern proper noun term be turned into a sort of generalization of all systems that ruled China.
I later learned that there are other parts of the museum that contain items that were brought in from other parts of China. I guess it is just another way of putting the Chinese spin on Tibetan history. So how much is really Tibetan? I do not know, but I now wish I had had time to talk more with my guide to find out what, if any, parts of the museum accurately displayed Tibetan history, as the Tibetans believe it is. I do not know if the Tibetans need their own country, but I at least think that they need a say in what their own history is.