The United States Government has taken the position that having Myanmar as a member of ASEAN reduces that group’s credibility and threatens to boycott ASEAN meetings. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. This exemplifies the kind of arrogance that the current administration seems to feel it has the right to exhibit just because it's the United States.
My wife, Pam, and I visited Myanmar for the first time in late 2004. We were there for 11 days. Before our departure, I, at least, agonized over whether it was "the right thing to do" to visit a country that trampled over people's rights as Myanmar supposedly did. Pam was more pragmatic about the whole thing and pointed out that we might never get an opportunity to visit the place if we moved back to the U.S. or one of us got sick, etc. I also read the Lonely Planet Guide and was encouraged by what they suggested we could do to lessen the chances of our "Yankee dollars" ending up in the pockets of the ruling junta.
Accordingly, we made sure we were using private resources whenever possible. We got fooled a little bit when we found that Mandalay Air was partially owned by Myanma Air, the national carrier, but we mostly we stuck to private hotels, restaurants, and touring agencies. Pam and I are veteran travelers and we rank this trip in our top-five all-time holidays. It was that wonderful.
The people we met were as hospitable as the Thais used to be before Thailand became inundated with tourists. The guides, in particular, went out of their way to ensure that we got the maximum enjoyment possible from the experience. They also seemed to have little fear of saying what they thought, good and bad, about their country and their rulers. Their degree of openness was refreshing.
I have been traveling around Asia for almost 30 years and personally experienced the regimes of Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines, Suharto in Indonesia, the communists in China, Mahathir in Malaysia, and Lee Kwan Yue in Singapore. I remember a Filipino bartender in the U.S. totally clamming up when the subject of Marcos came up. He was in the U.S. and yet he still feared for his relatives in the Philippines. We spent 5 days with a young woman guide in China, who, when asked a very non-threatening question about a recently announced policy of Zhu Rongzhi, then lionized Vice Premier, changed the subject, and didn't utter another word for an hour or more. I won't go on, but I have other stories.
One of our guides went so far as to call the Myanmar secret police "Our Gestapo." They and their families freely talked about forced labor, their personal situation, the country's economic problems, and the disasters of the early years of the regime. The only negative situation happened when one of our guides offered to take us to see the home of Aung San Suu Kyi, but when we actually tried to go there, she had never told the driver and we were too tired to push it.
Speaking of Aung San Suu Kyi, I strongly recommend, if you are interested, that you read
"The Burmese Fairy Tale" by Ma Thanegi, a pro-democracy activist and former political prisoner, now living in Yangon. I also recommend Ron Gluckman's Asiaweek article,
"Boycott bleeds Myanmar."So what's my point? It's simple. DO NOT BOYCOTT MYANMAR! The people are obviously benefiting from tourism. We could see it and we heard about it. The better the economic situation gets, the more likely democracy will follow. Witness China, Malaysia, and Vietnam. It almost never works the other way around. Witness Russia, the Philippines, Indonesia, etc. The situation has already liberalized some and it will get better, not worse, unless both the well-meaning idealists and the venal politicians (the two are almost always mutually exclusive) somehow manage to screw it up with their "interventions."
We didn't have to buy Foreign Exchange Certificates. We weren't forced to stay at government facilities. We were free to do what we wanted. We didn't try to go to the areas where the Army is fighting a border war or take pictures in forbidden areas. We had no reason to do so and were not interested in risking our lives to make a point.
We did stay in a fantastic hotel, Golden Isle Cottages, built on stilts on Inle Lake. The hotel is owned and operated by the Pao people, who at one time in the not too distant past were in armed rebellion against the regime. They are using the profits to build hospitals and schools and provide jobs for hundred of Pao. About 5,000 Burmese died in the 1988 revolution. It was caused by economic issues, not political ones. The People of Myanmar are not interested in going through that again. One of our guides said it best, "How do we know that what we get will be any better than what we have?"
What about my own government? We are not refusing to engage and have intercourse, so to speak, with countries like Saudi Arabia, China, Vietnam, Pakistan, Zaire, Nigeria, Egypt, and others that have regimes just as or more repressive than Myanmar.
Is the human rights record of Myanmar abominable? Yes, it is.
Would the people be better off with a more democratic government? We have no way of knowing.
Will things continue to improve in Myanmar for its people? It looks like it might.
Is tourism a positive force for change? I believe it is.
Is it more effective for the U.S. Government to engage the Government of Myanmar or is it more effective to boycott and thereby hurt the people? The generals are going to do just fine if there's a boycott or not.
I despair when politicians make blanket statements about countries they know little about or to serve a political agenda. Yeah, I know, they do it all the time.
If you doubt what I am suggesting, go to Myanmar and see for yourself. That way you can serve my agenda by expanding tourism in Myanmar and serve yourself by expanding your experience and having a guaranteed great time.